<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is contemporary? 508,000 results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://non-fiction.nl/2010/07/27/what-is-contemporary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://non-fiction.nl/2010/07/27/what-is-contemporary/</link>
	<description>Office for cultural innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 21:51:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juha van 't Zelfde</title>
		<link>http://non-fiction.nl/2010/07/27/what-is-contemporary/comment-page-1/#comment-1712</link>
		<dc:creator>Juha van 't Zelfde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 14:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://non-fiction.nl/?p=2192#comment-1712</guid>
		<description>Sorry for the late reply, your comment left us gazed and confused...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for the late reply, your comment left us gazed and confused&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meh</title>
		<link>http://non-fiction.nl/2010/07/27/what-is-contemporary/comment-page-1/#comment-1695</link>
		<dc:creator>meh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://non-fiction.nl/?p=2192#comment-1695</guid>
		<description>&quot;self-aware  protagonists of art&quot;
you realise how soaked in irony that is?
(apart from the personal irony, being a champion &quot;extensive (yet eloquent) self-gazer &quot; yourself...)

- out of the 8 comments on this thread, 7 of them are yourselves, rereretweeting/gazing at yourselves...

come on ... pull up, refocus...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;self-aware  protagonists of art&#8221;<br />
you realise how soaked in irony that is?<br />
(apart from the personal irony, being a champion &#8220;extensive (yet eloquent) self-gazer &#8221; yourself&#8230;)</p>
<p>- out of the 8 comments on this thread, 7 of them are yourselves, rereretweeting/gazing at yourselves&#8230;</p>
<p>come on &#8230; pull up, refocus&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juha van 't Zelfde</title>
		<link>http://non-fiction.nl/2010/07/27/what-is-contemporary/comment-page-1/#comment-1614</link>
		<dc:creator>Juha van 't Zelfde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://non-fiction.nl/?p=2192#comment-1614</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your thoughtful answer Xander. In the non-monetary blogosphere attention and commitment are our currency, and this is a generous amount you just donated. I like your fetishism, and it might invite the ever present question &#039;is this art?&#039; along to justify the transactions.

More food for thought, much obliged!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your thoughtful answer Xander. In the non-monetary blogosphere attention and commitment are our currency, and this is a generous amount you just donated. I like your fetishism, and it might invite the ever present question &#8216;is this art?&#8217; along to justify the transactions.</p>
<p>More food for thought, much obliged!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: продажа бумерангов</title>
		<link>http://non-fiction.nl/2010/07/27/what-is-contemporary/comment-page-1/#comment-1613</link>
		<dc:creator>продажа бумерангов</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://non-fiction.nl/?p=2192#comment-1613</guid>
		<description>Вот это пост!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Вот это пост!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xander</title>
		<link>http://non-fiction.nl/2010/07/27/what-is-contemporary/comment-page-1/#comment-1612</link>
		<dc:creator>Xander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://non-fiction.nl/?p=2192#comment-1612</guid>
		<description>Interesting observation. I think much can be said about the inflation of the term &#039;contemporary&#039; in, erm, contemporary discourse, but it&#039;s not exactly clear to me what you mean by &#039;contemporary music&#039;. What does this term in- and exclude? 
Still, one of the things you touch upon in your post (&#039;the art market vs other markets&#039;) is very relevant in this regard. Contemporary art is a highly commodified product that is traded in a large global market, in infinitely more physical variations than contemporary music (which is distributed, broadly speaking, in two different guises: as live music and as recorded music - there are no other &#039;things&#039; to buy here. While in art, it&#039;s all about object pluriformity, and is therefore subject to a kind of object fetishism that is more or less unknown to the field of contemporary music (apart from special record editions, etc.). This makes for a fundamentally different relationship between consumer and product). The attraction of the volatile speculative market value of art - the auction records, the hypes - is a force not to be underestimated: it lends it an aura of sexiness that consists of a unique blend of intellectual-critical superstructure and market capitalism substructure, to put it in Marxist terms. Everybody wants to have a piece of that! Or to at least sit next to the guy that gets a piece of that!
 
To go back to the numbers: there have always been much more art students than music students. That should account for the difference, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting observation. I think much can be said about the inflation of the term &#8216;contemporary&#8217; in, erm, contemporary discourse, but it&#8217;s not exactly clear to me what you mean by &#8216;contemporary music&#8217;. What does this term in- and exclude?<br />
Still, one of the things you touch upon in your post (&#8216;the art market vs other markets&#8217;) is very relevant in this regard. Contemporary art is a highly commodified product that is traded in a large global market, in infinitely more physical variations than contemporary music (which is distributed, broadly speaking, in two different guises: as live music and as recorded music &#8211; there are no other &#8216;things&#8217; to buy here. While in art, it&#8217;s all about object pluriformity, and is therefore subject to a kind of object fetishism that is more or less unknown to the field of contemporary music (apart from special record editions, etc.). This makes for a fundamentally different relationship between consumer and product). The attraction of the volatile speculative market value of art &#8211; the auction records, the hypes &#8211; is a force not to be underestimated: it lends it an aura of sexiness that consists of a unique blend of intellectual-critical superstructure and market capitalism substructure, to put it in Marxist terms. Everybody wants to have a piece of that! Or to at least sit next to the guy that gets a piece of that!</p>
<p>To go back to the numbers: there have always been much more art students than music students. That should account for the difference, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

